Download Rationale For Mac
Question How do I install IBM Rational Developer for i without downloading the large zip files? Cause The Rational Developer for i evaluation page which provides the option of downloading zip files is at but does not show the Web Install option or the Web Install option does not work properly or the Web Install option directs users to this technote. Answer You can do a Web install of Rational Developer for i. Only the content for the features you select will be downloaded from IBM. The product will be automatically installed at the latest fixpack level.
If you are installing on Windows, the is easiest. Otherwise, please follow the below. Automated Procedure (Windows only): Download and run IBM Installation Manager that is pre-configured for Rational Developer for i on Windows. Download RationalDeveloperForiV9.6TrialWebInstall-Windows.zip from. Unzip the file to a local folder with no spaces in the name. Run AdminInstall.bat if you are an administrator and want to install it for all users on the machine.
Run UserInstall.bat if you want to install just for the current user. Note: You will be prompted for a user id and password. This is your IBM ID. It is required to be able to install the product. If you do not have one, you can register for one (they are free) at. Manual Procedure (Windows, Linux, Mac OS X): The steps are to (1) install or update IBM Installation Manager (if it is not already installed or at correct level), (2) configure Installation Manager to use the RDi repository, and then (3) start the install. Install or update IBM Installation Manager (1.8.7 is minimum for 9.6, 1.8.3 is minimum for 9.5 but 1.8.6 or higher is recommended).
If you have IBM Installation Manager installed already:. Click File - Preferences. Go to the Updates preference page. Ensure that Search for Installation Manager updates is checked. If you do not have Installation Manager or Installation Manager does not update automatically, you can download Installation Manager for free.
Choose the one that corresponds to your platform. Note: If 'Application is damaged and can't be opened. You should move it to the Trash.' Message appears, this is due to the OS X Gatekeeper feature. See for more information. Run the Install executable if you are an administrator and want to install it for all users on the machine.
Run UserInst executable if you want to install just for the current user. Review the document for more details on how to download and install Installation Manager. If you have the 32-bit version of Installation Manager installed already (check HelpAbout for the Architecture) and it does not update automatically for some reason:.
Specify the repository for Rational Developer for i in IBM Installation Manager. In IBM Installation Manager, click File - Preferences. Go to the Repositories preference page. Add a repository (note: the URLs are specifically used in IBM Installation Manager, not a web browser). For Rational Developer for i 9.6:. For Rational Developer for i 9.5:.
Click Install in IBM Installation Manager. Note: You will be prompted for a user id and password. This is your IBM ID. It is required to be able to install the product. If you do not have one, you can register for one (they are free) at.
Follow the prompts in Installation Manager to complete the install of Rational Developer for i. Only the content for the features you select will be downloaded from IBM.
Download Rationale For Machine Liker
My 2011 MacBook Pro is in perfect condition, minus one foot pad on the bottom of it. It's my daily Adobe Creative driver, web browsing machine, occasional WoW Private Server gaming machine, and my wife's primary Master's degree schooling machine. This thing can keep up with anything I've seen out of Apple since it was produced. It is one of the last models were I can take the hard drive out myself, swap my own RAM, turn my optical drive into another storage bay, has a separate GPU, and do my own maintenance without having to worry about solder or making the 2 hour trek to the Genius Bar. It has an Intel i7 processor and supports 16GB of 1333 Mhz RAM. This biggest shortcoming of this Mac is the wireless card, which does not have updated Bluetooth to allow Handoff support. Interestingly enough, I have the replacement card and the terminal hack to get it recognized, but I haven't ever truly needed Handoff support.
But that's a Bluetooth/wifi issue, not a limitation of the ability to run the OS. I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how my machine is incompatible with MacOS 10.14, other than Hardware Greed™. Can anyone lend some technical insight into why Apple would choose to not continue supporting my beast of a machine, my good ol' 2011 MBP? Edit: I'm not trying to /dump on Apple for their support. I'm legitimately inquiring about which pieces of my hardware are not good enough to run this OS? Asus, today, is selling a 1.5GHz laptop with 4GB RAM.
And Windows 10 preinstalled. The Windows kernel and drivers will run perfectly fine on a 1 GHz-ish machine - they're not very high-demand processes. So will most of the.Net library. The UI, layered on top of the OS stack, will run okay if you turn off a lot of the animations and glitz.
No, you can't run Steam games and Photoshop on it. No, you can't play BluRay or 4K video. But for basic tasks - web browsing, email, Word - it'll run perfectly fine, which is why manufacturers like Asus sell Windows 10 netbooks with specs that rival those of 2005 desktops. The other answer is that windows doesn’t directly support hardware. So yeah those are the minimum requirements but it’s out of their hands if it runs like garbage. Apple supports all their hardware so by saying the 2011 is no longer supported they are done adding specific software support to those models. Microsoft doesn’t release specific software support for any model except their surface line so not one computer in 2011 was ever officially supported, manufacturers have to constantly release new drivers to fix their problems.
The other answer is that windows doesn’t directly support hardware. So yeah those are the minimum requirements but it’s out of their hands if it runs like garbage. When Windows runs slowly, do you think that people blame their hardware? Of course not - they blame Microsoft, since the OS is the thing they see that's running poorly. Microsoft doesn’t release specific software support for any model except their surface line so not one computer in 2011 was ever officially supported, manufacturers have to constantly release new drivers to fix their problems.
First, see above. If Microsoft releases a version of Windows that for whatever reason breaks support for old hardware, users blame Microsoft, not the OEM. Second, not true. Microsoft provides default device drivers that are supposed to support hardware generically - displays, sound adapters, storage, printers, keyboards, mice, etc.
Download Rationale For Mac Minecraft
Those drivers especially support older hardware for which the manufacturers and OEMs don't provide updated drivers for Windows. Microsoft also owns WHQL, which certifies that hardware, including older hardware, will work on Windows; so the company certainly has to do a ton of work to maintain backwards support for older devices. Oh, I agree: Windows is a dumpster fire. My experience with Windows started with Windows 1.0 on an 80286 PC.
I used every major version of Windows - 3.1, 95, 2000, XP, Vista, and 7. Right up until Windows 8. The day I bought my first Mac - which was actually the late-2011 MacBook Pro I mentioned above - was a few days after the Windows 8 public announcement. Since then I've bought two Mac Minis, a MacBook Air, and a latest-gen MacBook Pro (not for myself) - and I'm Redditing on a late-2016 iMac, which is my main machine. I do run Windows 10 on a home theater PC and within Parallels, but that's it.
So, yes: I fully agree with you that Windows is terrible, terrible software. It still runs on hardware from 2004, because it's strongly backwards-compatible and even offered as a 32-bit variant. We must give credit where due - which is the point of this discussion. Depending on whether it's an early-2011 or late-2011, it's either a Radeon 6750M or 6770M, both of which don't support Metal at all. Not Metal 1 or Metal 2. That seems to be the limiting factor. The Nvidia GPUs in the 2012 models (same body, non-retina) do seem to support it, at least enough to run Mojave.
If you're really set on that form factor, maybe picking up a 2012 MBP on eBay would be worth it for you. That's what I'm doing, since my 2011 died six months ago from the dreaded GPU failure. When my 2012 arrives next week, one of the first things I'm going to do is test Mojave on it. If it runs well, I'm probably going to pick up a 2012 logic board to swap into my 2011 to give it new life again.
It has to do with Metal API they updated it to what they call the 2nd gen. Metal requires at least an Intel HD and Iris Graphics from the HD 4000 series or newer, an AMD GCN-based GPU, or a Nvidia Kepler-based GPU or newer. I looked into why they have those requirements. It has to do with low-level and low-overhead support by the graphics. For the intel graphics it comes down to the fact that the intel hd 3000 is a directx 10.1 card while the intel hd 4000 was originally a directx 11 card but I believe it has had some 'patches' allowing it to support Metal. For the AMD 'GCN' it is a architecture that debuted back in 2012 with the release of the Radeon HD 7000's series.
This was a massive improvement over the previous 'Terrascale' architecture. 'GCN' ushered in the Mantle API which would not gain significant ground and would be axed by AMD but it would lay the groundwork for the Khronos Group to create the Vulkan API which is essentially a fork of the Mantle API and its' unofficial successor. Metal functions in a way somewhat like Vulkan in that it is designed to have low-overhead and get the graphics work done without much interaction from the OS. Anyways the Radeon HD 6000 series cards are based on 'Terascale' and have no way to communicate with the low-level, low-overhead Metal API, just as they could not communicate with Mantle or Vulkan. For the Nvidia 'Kepler' architecture the story is the same, but less lengthy. Support for Direct3D 12 feature level 110 was added.
Which allows low-level, low-overhead Metal to communicate with them. Fermi the previous architecture did not have this natively and it was recently 'patched' to have feature 11. Still it still doesn't preform as well as the Kepler or newer architecture in the area of low-level communication. TL;DR Your graphics cards in your 2011 MBP cannot communicate with Metal API. It relies on a middleman more often, the CPU. This is inefficient and a waste of time and resources.
Metal doesn't even bother trying to figure out where your gpu is spewing out commands. It just wants to communicate with the gpu one-on-one without the middleman.
In High Sierra and before Apple allowed OpenGL to be used instead of Metal to render graphics. OpenGL has been around awhile and is supported by every card made for a pci-e slot. Apparently OpenGL will no longer be allowed to render the GUI.