Farmington Municipal Schools M10 Own Brand
This home with a Spanish flare is absolutely enchanting. In a quiet, private location, enjoy the lovely back yard and garden shaded by mature trees and decorated with roses, grape vines and a patio fit for luxury entertaining. Tucked away in a peaceful cul-de-sac, you will feel like you're in your own little world. The terraced yard and rock work here is mesmerizing.
The elegant interior is detailed with fine finishes and the perfect balance of earth tone colors to complement wrought iron railings, Spanish Saltillo tile and dark alder wood floors. The kitchen is an entertainer's dream with custom cabinets and lighting. The old-world look of antiquing and scrolled embellishments accents white cabinetry lit up by the natural light of huge, high-quality windows. A large island in the kitchen provides a decorative element and plenty of countertop space to prepare a gourmet meal.
The Thermador refrigerator will exceed your expectations! The breathtaking 800-square-foot master suite is fit for a king and queen. A lovely fireplace helps create atmosphere, two walk-in closets offer his and hers storage and the bath is absolutely jaw-dropping. Imagine double sinks in a suave setting of imported Greek Travertine, a jetted tub and a magnificent walk-in shower. Slip out onto the covered veranda for sunrise and sunset. The view will inspire you and in the evening, relax you as you unwind in the beautiful surroundings.
The veranda runs the entire width of the home. There are two a/c unites for this home and three furnaces! Executives, you will find your office space in the lovely two-story out-building and still have room for a gym, home theater, or anything your heart desires. You have just got to see the craftsmanship that makes this home a true showpiece. Call today for your tour.
Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed accurate. Buyer to verify all information. Get flash for chrome mac. The multiple listing information is provided by Wasatch Front Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. From a copyrighted compilation of listings. The compilation of listings and each individual listing are © 2018 Wasatch Front Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The information provided is for consumers' personal, non-commercial use and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing. Listing information last updated on November 27th, 2018 at 11:28am MST.
Senior District Judge. 2 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.
Farmington Municipal Schools M10 Own Brands
34(a); 10th Cir. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 3 Plaintiff appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant in this employment discrimination action. Plaintiff complains of reverse racial discrimination, gender discrimination, hostile working environment, violation of the Equal Pay Act, and retaliation.
In a thorough and thoughtful order, the district court noted plaintiff's failure to file timely administrative objections regarding certain alleged incidents, and then went on to hold she had not demonstrated the existence of a triable issue with respect to any of her claims. 4 We review the disposition of a summary judgment motion de novo, using the. Same standard employed by the district court. Prudential Ins. Co., 50 F.3d 793, 796 (10th Cir.1995).
That is, although we view the record in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, we will affirm summary judgment w hen there is no genuine issue of mate rial fact and t he moving p arty is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wells Fargo AG Credit Corp., 990 F.2d 1169, 1171 (10th Cir.1993). 5 A corollary to this standard, dealing with the sequence and character of the parties' resp ective burd ens, is especi ally impor tant here. O nce the mova nt demonstrates the absence of factual issues negating its legal entitlement to judgment, t he opposin g party mus t present sp ecific eviden ce disputi ng those dispositive matters for which she carries the burden of proof.
Wolf, 50 F.3d at 796. Accordingly, this court has stressed that, on appeal, it is the appellant's duty to muster, identify, and argue, by particularized reference, the evidence necessary to challenge summary judgment, and that, 'in the absence of such specific reference, we will not search the record in an effort to determine whether there exists dormant evidence which might require submission of the case to a jury.' Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 968 F.2d 1022, 1025 (10th Cir.), cert. Denied, 113 S.Ct. 635 (1992); see, e.g., Gross v. Burggraf Constr.
Co., 53 F.3d 1531, 1546 (10th Cir.1995). This duty also derives from a general rule of appellate advocacy: ' 'The brief of the appellant shall contain. The argument shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.' ' United States v.
Edwards, Nos. 94-5202, 94-5003, 94-5203, 94-5204, 1995 WL 621785 at. 6 (10th Cir. 24, 1995) (quoting Fed. 28(a)(5)); see also SEC v.
Thomas, 965 F.2d 825, 827 (10th Cir.1992). 6 Plaintiff's opening brief. Has an introductory 'Statement of the Facts' containing a lengthy, discursive account of her employment with defendant. However, this amalgamation of background information, potentially relevant complaint, and incidental aspersion is not systematically tied by reference to the later legal/argumentative sections of the brief, some of which are devoid of particulari zed factual or evidentiary references of t heir own. In effect, plai ntiff has presented a mass of miscellaneous material and left it to this court to collect, organize, and articulate the cumulative legal significance of pertinent items therein with respect to each of her various claims. This court does not construct or flesh out an appellant's arguments; rather, it is the appellant's responsibility to tie the salient facts, supported by specific record citation, to her legal contentions. See Gross, 53 F.3d at 1546.
For reasons similar to those informing the decisions cited above, 'such an appellate judicial supplementation of the nonmovant's presentation would not be fair to either the.